10-08-2016, 04:45 AM
Is there really such an abrupt cut off in the size distribution? 37 which have 220 km diameter, and none larger than that? Seems incredible. Compare with the size distribution of the asteroids:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Masses_of_asteroids_vs_main_belt.png
Is there some error or misunderstanding in this data?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Masses_of_asteroids_vs_main_belt.png
Is there some error or misunderstanding in this data?