09-26-2015, 03:35 PM
Here is a reason why active water stabilization of habitats. All the habitats I have seen described use ground transportation. Rotational and antirotational masstransit will affect rotation. Transit perpendicular to rotation will affect stability. Nobody seems to be taking this into account. The mass difference is inconsequential is not acceptable, the effect is cumulative.
This is where my argument for aerial masstransit comes in. The amount of torque applied to the habitat by the movement of air is far less than that of ground transit. The further travel by air the less torque applied compared to ground transit. Every movement applies torque on Earth or in space, however in space the mass of the habitat is small enough that torque applied must be compensated for.
This is where my argument for aerial masstransit comes in. The amount of torque applied to the habitat by the movement of air is far less than that of ground transit. The further travel by air the less torque applied compared to ground transit. Every movement applies torque on Earth or in space, however in space the mass of the habitat is small enough that torque applied must be compensated for.