09-16-2016, 12:00 AM
I was thinking that perhaps the best shape for an habitat is not supposed to be a circle.
For example in a thorus habitat the G at the bottom of the thorus would be different from the G experienced near the side, due to the difference of radius.
Even a 0.01G difference could provoke weird feelings to the peoples (a 100kg person would "lose" 1kg basically walking a couple hundreds meter) and/or structural problems to large buildings.
It would be cool if we could "draw" the section of an habitat, even just by a drawing in 2d using differently coloured straight lines.
Each colour would represent a different "material" for the wall/floor. for example, brown for soil, grey for steel/structural element, blue for windows.
then the software could check if the drawing is a closed form and create the solid simply by making a 360° turn of the 2d form.
the "G" indicator will need to be only calculated on "soil" level.
For example in a thorus habitat the G at the bottom of the thorus would be different from the G experienced near the side, due to the difference of radius.
Even a 0.01G difference could provoke weird feelings to the peoples (a 100kg person would "lose" 1kg basically walking a couple hundreds meter) and/or structural problems to large buildings.
It would be cool if we could "draw" the section of an habitat, even just by a drawing in 2d using differently coloured straight lines.
Each colour would represent a different "material" for the wall/floor. for example, brown for soil, grey for steel/structural element, blue for windows.
then the software could check if the drawing is a closed form and create the solid simply by making a 360° turn of the 2d form.
the "G" indicator will need to be only calculated on "soil" level.